Телефон: 8-800-350-22-65
WhatsApp: 8-800-350-22-65
Telegram: sibac
Прием заявок круглосуточно
График работы офиса: с 9.00 до 18.00 Нск (5.00 - 14.00 Мск)

Статья опубликована в рамках: LXXVI Международной научно-практической конференции «Актуальные проблемы юриспруденции» (Россия, г. Новосибирск, 20 ноября 2023 г.)

Наука: Юриспруденция

Секция: Информационное право

Скачать книгу(-и): Сборник статей конференции

Библиографическое описание:
Sidikov R. DATA PROTECTION CHALLENGES AND SOLUTIONS IN CYBERSPORTS // Актуальные проблемы юриспруденции: сб. ст. по матер. LXXVI междунар. науч.-практ. конф. № 11(75). – Новосибирск: СибАК, 2023. – С. 143-149.
Проголосовать за статью
Дипломы участников
У данной статьи нет
дипломов

DATA PROTECTION CHALLENGES AND SOLUTIONS IN CYBERSPORTS

Sidikov Rustam

Master student at Tashkent State University of Law,

Uzbekistan, Tashkent

ПРОБЛЕМЫ ЗАЩИТЫ ДАННЫХ И РЕШЕНИЯ В КИБЕРСПОРТЕ

 

Сидиков Рустам

магистрант Ташкентского государственного юридического университета,

Узбекистан, г. Ташкент

 

ABSTRACT

The rapid rise of competitive cybersports has created large volumes of sensitive participant and fan data distributed globally across interconnected platforms and systems. Effective governance frameworks protecting such data remain imperative but challenging given unique considerations like extensive underage involvement. This paper examines key data protection pressures confronting cybersports entities including granular analytics insights, transnational regulations and data monetization temptations. Tailored strategies balancing security, privacy and usability warrant urgent prioritization. Technical, policy and process measures like access controls, cryptography, regulatory compliance, cyber-hygiene education and oversight partnerships constitute vital foundations. Continuously improving frameworks through collaboration, assessing emerging risks and involving stakeholders in co-creating solutions promises effective data stewardship upholding ethics alongside innovation in this ascendant sector.

АННОТАЦИЯ

Быстрый рост соревновательного киберспорта привел к созданию больших объемов конфиденциальных данных участников и болельщиков, распределенных по всему миру через взаимосвязанные платформы и системы. Эффективные механизмы управления, защищающие такие данные, остаются необходимыми, но сложными, учитывая уникальные факторы, такие как широкое участие несовершеннолетних. В этом документе рассматриваются ключевые проблемы защиты данных, с которыми сталкиваются киберспортивные организации, включая детализированную аналитическую информацию, транснациональное регулирование и соблазны монетизации данных. Индивидуальные стратегии, сочетающие безопасность, конфиденциальность и удобство использования, требуют срочного определения приоритетов. Технические, политические и процессуальные меры, такие как контроль доступа, криптография, соблюдение нормативных требований, образование в области кибергигиены и партнерские отношения в сфере надзора, составляют жизненно важную основу. Постоянное совершенствование систем посредством сотрудничества, оценки возникающих рисков и привлечения заинтересованных сторон к совместному созданию решений обещает эффективное управление данными, соблюдение этики наряду с инновациями в этом развивающемся секторе.

 

Keywords: cybersports, esports, data protection, security, privacy, regulations

Ключевые слова: киберспорт, киберспорт, защита данных, безопасность, конфиденциальность, регулирование.

 

Introduction

Competitive cybersports represents a pioneering digital entertainment model bringing immense new opportunities for fan engagement, revenue growth and positive community development. However, concomitant data protection challenges necessitate responsible handling of sensitive information generated at staggering volumes encompassing players, audiences, vendors and partners distributed worldwide across numerous interconnected systems. Effective data governance through tailored solutions balancing security, usability and trust proves imperative to enable sustainable growth in this nascent sector.

Cybersports tournaments and businesses collect extensive personally identifiable information, financial details, gameplay statistics, biometric data and behavioral insights used for vital purposes like fan authentication, anti-cheating evaluations, strategy analysis, broadcast graphics etc. Such attractive targets require robust access controls, encryption and ethical usage principles. Many participants constitute digitally native youths below legal majority necessitating additional consent safeguards. Transnational tournaments and fragmented jurisdictions multiply compliance complexity. Data monetization temptations through commoditized licensing risk exploitative practices without oversight. Upholding player privacy expectations and long-term consumer trust necessitates nuanced data protection frameworks customized for the sector's specialized context. This paper analyzes unique data risks in cybersports and proposes technical, policy and process measures organizations can undertake to strengthen protection. Industry stakeholders should collaboratively uplift safe data stewardship as a cornerstone of integrity.

Analyzes

Unique Data Protection Challenges in Cybersports

As a fundamentally digital sector with global participation spanning numerous interconnected systems, cybersports generates unprecedented data protection complexities requiring tailored solutions:

  • Vast volumes of granular performance and personal data from extensive quantified analytics, biometric monitoring and cross-referenced datasets create immense security and privacy risks requiring stringent access controls, encryption and retention procedures aligned to protection regulations [1].
  • Unique attributes like individually identifiable gameplay statistics derived from actions, communications and competing within proprietary gaming platforms constitute novel data types still evolving governance protections compared to traditional sports analytics not exposing personal playstyles [11].
  • Live stream audiences including underage youth necessitate additional consent validity verifications, parental oversight mechanisms and restrictions on behavioral tracking compared to general entertainment mediums [12].
  • Transnational tournament participation spanning Europe, North America, Asia and other regions with markedly different privacy laws creates complexity in harmonizing compliance across jurisdictions [10].
  • Myriad interconnected systems like gaming platforms, tournament networks, broadcast production, fan engagement apps and partner technologies multiply potential vulnerabilities lacking consistent security baselines and data flow oversight [17].
  • Temptations for unauthorized data usage or sharing for purposes like player scouting, strategy analysis or direct commercial licensing reward misuse absent effective access controls, auditing and ethical self-governance [1].
  • Lack of worker collective bargaining in non-unionized nascent sector currently exacerbates information and bargaining power asymmetry between players/talent and teams/employers, necessitating governance balancing individual rights with operational needs [12].
  • Automated analytics algorithms using techniques like machine learning can entail biases, quality issues and dignity harms absent transparency and human oversight, requiring tailored protections per emerging regulations [13].
  • Increasing use of augmented and mixed reality systems overlaying digital information and interactions upon live matches and tournaments poses novel data risks needing assessment [14].

Together these factors underscore the pressing imperative and complexity of developing nuanced, context-specific data protection solutions for cybersports through multilateral collaboration between impacted stakeholders. Responsible advances sufficiently safeguarding individuals while allowing sector growth warrant urgent priority.

Implementing Effective Data Protection Strategies

Realizing robust data protection solutions warrants pursuing technical, policy and process improvements encompassing:

Granular permission policies limiting data access only to authorized users and read-only wherever possible based on necessity and proportionality principles underpin compliance [5]. Role-based access combined with strong access governance proves essential.

Encrypting data in transit and at rest protects from exposure risks like improper storage. Appropriately managing and securing keys remains imperative to prevent encryption circumvention.

Collecting, retaining and processing only necessary personal data for explicitly specified lawful purposes and limited durations aligns with data protection laws and ethics [3].

Scrubbing direct player identifiers from gameplay statistics and raw telemetry before broader analytical usage protects privacy while retaining insights.

Educating all personnel like players, managers and technical staff in basics like strong passwords, multi-factor authentication, safe web usage, social engineering identification etc. strengthens cyber-hygiene.

Enabling lawful compliant data usage across transnational tournament locations via consent validity mechanisms, reconstituted governing laws and interoperable protection agreements facilitates global operations.

Complying with relevant frameworks like EU GDPR, US COPPA, China's PIPL etc. tailored for cybersports use cases proves foundational for trust [10]. Internalizing principles like transparency, accountability and proportionality assists upholding ethics even where formal regulations remain inadequate presently.

Contractually mandating security and privacy protections from vendors, technology suppliers and other third-party entities ensures consistent data handling aligned to internal policies.

Periodic independent audits evaluating privacy risks, data practices against policies and regulatory obligations provides assurance while identifying gaps needing improvement.

Involving player representative bodies, civil society organizations etc. in consultations and collaborative policymaking upholds interests of those most impacted.

Proactively evaluating privacy and ethical risks from nascent tracking technologies like facial emotion analysis, augmented reality environments etc. enables preventative protections before adverse consequences manifest at scale.

Promoting development of privacy-enhancing technologies like federated learning, differential privacy, homomorphic encryption etc. through challenges, incubators and incentives fosters secure-by-design solutions.

Empowering independent oversight authorities and grievance redressal mechanisms strengthens enforcement and demonstrates accountability.

Requiring data protection and cyber liability policies covering incidents like breaches, extortion etc. transfers financial risks while driving adoption of controls for favorable underwriting.

A combination of strengthening internal controls and protections, improving external transparency and oversight, building personnel capacity through training, and collaborating across stakeholders offers a holistic pathway for uplifting data protection foundations in the cybersports ecosystem proactively ahead of large-scale incidents, rather than reactively responding post-facto.

Conclusion

Effective data protection constitutes a vital imperative for cybersports as it penetrates mainstream entertainment globally. Responsible handling of extensive sensitive information remains crucial for upholding competitive integrity, youth safety and consumer trust while enabling growth. However, the sector's novel attributes necessitate tailored solutions spanning technology, regulations, processes and education customized to the realities of massive digital engagement, underage participants and decentralized operations. Stakeholders across gaming platforms, tournament organizers, teams and player groups must collectively commit to elevating data stewardship through continuous improvement while actively involving impacted groups in shaping policies. With constructive collaboration and pragmatic execution, cybersports can pioneer privacy-centric models benefitting the broader digital economy. But coordinated urgent action remains imperative before leaks, breaches or exploitative practices trigger long-term reputational damage and distrust. The initial frameworks established presently will set the trajectory of data governance for this nascent sector as it scales rapidly in coming years.

 

References:

  1. Cranmer, E. et al. (2022). Esports Analytics Through an Ethics Lens: Critical Perspectives on Health, Biometric and Emotional Recognition Systems. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 4, 818099. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2022.818099
  2. Curran, D. (2022). Cybersecurity guide: 10 top tips for gamers to stay safe online. Comparitech. https://www.comparitech.com/blog/vpn-privacy/cybersecurity-gamers-guide/
  3. De Hert, P. et al. (2018). The right to data portability in the GDPR: Towards user-centric interoperability of digital services. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(2), 193-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2017.10.003
  4. ESIC (2022). Standards, Codes and Policies. https://esic.gg/standards/
  5. EU GDPR (2016). Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj
  6. Freeman, W. (2022). EA User Accounts Compromised After Data Breach. TheGamer. https://www.thegamer.com/ea-user-accounts-compromised-data-breach/
  7. Goslin, M. (2022). Pennsylvania Attorney General’s Office Notifies Gamers of 2020 Data Breach. ESPN. https://www.espn.com/esports/story/_/id/34344010/pennsylvania-attorney-general-office-notifies-gamers-2020-data-breach
  8. Imperva (2022). Video Game Hacking. https://www.imperva.com/learn/application-security/video-game-hacking/
  9. Kim, H. et al. (2019). On enhancing GDPR compliance of person data. IEEE Access, 7, 95297-95318. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2928267
  10. Lingle, R. (2019). Esports Continue Push Toward Mainstream With New League and Union. The Esports Observer. https://esportsobserver.com/overwatch-call-of-duty-esports/
  11. Luz, S. et al. (2019). eSports and Fair Play: Competition Integrity Matters!. Recursos Rurais (Serie Cursos), no. 11. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342368405_eSports_and_Fair_Play_Competition_Integrity_Matters
  12. Macey, J. et al. (2022). “Give Me Some Data!”: An Exploration of Surveillance Capitalism in Esports. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4064514
  13. Mylrea, M. et al. (2020). Professional gaming & GDPR: Effects on esport’s legal issues. Norwegian Centre for Research Data. https://www.forskningsdata.no/en/news-archive/professional-gaming-gdpr-effects-on-esports-legal-issues/
  14. Nan, N. et al. (2021). A survey on the security of augmented reality: Issues, challenges, and opportunities. Computers & Security, 105, 102235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2021.102235
  15. Newzoo (2020). NEWZOO: ESPORTS WILL TOP $1 BILLION FOR FIRST TIME THIS YEAR. https://newzoo.com/insights/articles/newzoo-esports-will-top-1-billion-for-first-time-this-year
  16. Schwiddessen, D. (2019). eSports And Gambling – A Dangerous Mix? An Empirical Survey About Gambling Behavior And Problem Gambling Among eSports Enthusiasts. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333205612_eSports_And_Gambling_-_A_Dangerous_Mix_An_Empirical_Survey_About_Gambling_Behavior_And_Problem_Gambling_Among_eSports_Enthusiasts
  17. Seo, Y. (2016). Professionalized consumption and identity transformations in the field of eSports. Journal of Business Research, 69(1), 264-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.07.039
Удалить статью(вывести сообщение вместо статьи): 
Проголосовать за статью
Дипломы участников
У данной статьи нет
дипломов

Оставить комментарий

Форма обратной связи о взаимодействии с сайтом
CAPTCHA
Этот вопрос задается для того, чтобы выяснить, являетесь ли Вы человеком или представляете из себя автоматическую спам-рассылку.