THE BELT AND ROAD INITIATIVE AS SOFT POWER INFLUENCE AND DIGITAL DIPLOMACY

ABSTRACT

The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) extends beyond economic development, serving as a key instrument of China's soft power. Through massive infrastructure investments, trade agreements, and cultural diplomacy, the BRI strengthens China’s influence in participating countries. Economic dependencies created by Chinese-funded projects enhance political ties, while initiatives such as Confucius Institutes and state-controlled media shape global perceptions. Digital diplomacy, particularly through the Digital Silk Road, further expands China’s technological reach. Despite its benefits, the BRI faces criticism over debt dependency, lack of transparency, and geopolitical risks. Its long-term impact will depend on balancing influence with cooperation and addressing concerns about economic and political dominance.

Keywords: Belt and Road Initiative, soft power, China’s global influence, digital diplomacy, cultural diplomacy, digital Silk Road, Confucius Institutes, debt-trap diplomacy

Chapter One: Introduction

The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is one of the most ambitious economic and geopolitical projects of the 21st century, encompassing over 140 countries and involving trillions of dollars in investment. The BRI is expected to increase global trade by 6.2% and boost incomes by 2.9% in participating countries [1]. While often framed as an economic endeavor aimed at infrastructure development and trade facilitation, the BRI is also a strategic soft power tool that extends China’s global influence beyond traditional economic mechanisms. Through infrastructure investments, cultural exchanges, and digital diplomacy, China is leveraging the BRI to reshape international relations and expand its geopolitical reach.

The BRI, launched in 2013 by President Xi Jinping, is China’s grand vision for global connectivity through land and maritime trade routes that modernize the ancient Silk Road [2]. It includes massive infrastructure projects such as railways, ports, highways, and digital communication networks spanning Asia, Europe, Africa, and Latin America. The initiative aims to address global infrastructure deficits, promote trade, and enhance economic cooperation among participating countries. However, beyond economic aspirations, the BRI has a significant political and cultural dimension. China uses the BRI not only to expand its trade networks, but also to cultivate influence through diplomatic and cultural engagement. By funding large-scale projects in developing nations, China gains leverage over recipient governments, deepening its political relationships and aligning global policies with its own strategic interests [3]. The initiative allows China to challenge the traditional Western-led global order, positioning itself as an alternative power center.

Chapter Two: Understanding Soft Power and the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI)

Soft power, a term introduced by political scientist Joseph Nye, refers to a nation’s ability to shape the preferences and behaviors of others through attraction and persuasion rather than coercion or military force. Unlike hard power, which relies on economic pressure or military intervention, soft power operates through culture, political values, and foreign policy to gain influence in global affairs. Nye argues that countries with strong soft power can create an environment in which others willingly align with their interests, not because they are forced to, but because they find the values and culture attractive [4]. Nations deploy soft power through various means, including cultural diplomacy, media influence, international aid, and policy engagement. France has promoted its language and art through institutions like Alliance Française, and Japan has used anime, technology, and cuisine to enhance its international appeal. Soft power is particularly effective in shaping long-term diplomatic relationships, as it fosters goodwill, trust, and shared cultural understanding between nations.

The Belt and Road Initiative aligns closely with soft power strategies by fostering economic partnerships, strengthening cultural ties, and positioning China as a benevolent global leader. Unlike direct political or military interventions, the BRI allows China to expand its global influence through infrastructure investments, trade agreements, and people-to-people exchanges. Through the construction of roads, railways, and digital networks, the BRI not only enhances global connectivity but also generates economic dependence on China, giving Beijing long-term strategic leverage over participating nations. Additionally, the BRI incorporates cultural diplomacy by promoting Chinese language, education, and traditional values. Confucius Institutes, which provide language training and academic programs, have been established in many BRI partner countries, strengthening China’s cultural influence [5]. China also leverages the BRI to reshape international norms and governance structures. Through initiatives like the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), Beijing provides an alternative to Western-led financial institutions such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. This approach reflects China’s broader goal of promoting a multipolar world order where it plays a central role in setting economic and diplomatic agendas [6].

Chapter Three: The BRI’s Influence on Global Stage

The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has significantly reshaped the global landscape, positioning China as a dominant force in international affairs. By extending economic partnerships through infrastructure development, trade agreements, and financial assistance, China has strengthened its geopolitical reach and influence in global governance structures. While the initiative is often framed as an economic development project, its implications go beyond trade and investment. Through the BRI, China has fostered economic dependencies, cultivated political alliances, and strategically positioned itself in key international organizations, altering the global balance of power.

One of the primary ways the BRI extends China’s influence is through economic interdependence. By funding infrastructure projects in over 140 countries, China has positioned itself as a key player in global trade and development. Many participating nations, especially in Asia, Africa, and Latin America, rely on Chinese investment for roads, railways, ports, and energy projects, deepening their economic ties with Beijing. These investments, while fostering development, often result in long-term financial obligations that bind recipient countries to China’s economic policies and political interests. A prime example is the Hambantota Port project in Sri Lanka. In 2017, after struggling to repay its Chinese loans, Sri Lanka was forced to lease the port to China for 99 years, raising concerns about debt dependency and Beijing’s strategic maritime expansion [7]. Similarly, in Africa, China has built major infrastructure projects such as Kenya’s Standard Gauge Railway and Ethiopia’s Addis Ababa-Djibouti Railway, both funded through Chinese loans and executed by Chinese companies. These projects boost trade and connectivity but also increase debt burdens on recipient countries [8].

In Europe, China has made strategic investments in ports such as Greece’s Piraeus Port, where China’s state-owned COSCO Shipping holds a majority stake. This investment has transformed Piraeus into one of the busiest ports in Europe, strengthening China’s foothold in the Mediterranean and European trade routes. These economic linkages not only enhance trade efficiency but also provide China with leverage over European economic policies and political decisions. Beyond physical infrastructure, the BRI also extends China’s influence in financial systems. The establishment of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) provides an alternative to Western-dominated financial institutions like the World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF), allowing China to shape global economic governance. Through the AIIB, China offers development financing with fewer political conditions, making it an attractive option for many developing nations seeking investment without the regulatory oversight typically imposed by Western lenders.

The BRI is not just an economic initiative, it is a geopolitical strategy that enhances China’s global political influence. Through infrastructure investment and trade partnerships, China has been able to strengthen diplomatic ties and build alliances with a broad range of nations. These relationships help China gain leverage in international affairs, as many BRI countries align their policies with Beijing’s interests in exchange for economic support. China’s expanding influence is evident in its growing role within international organizations such as the United Nations (UN). Over the past decade, China has increased its financial contributions to the UN, secured leadership positions in key UN agencies, and used its influence to promote policies that align with its strategic objectives [9]. China’s BRI diplomacy has helped it build stronger ties with developing nations in Africa, Latin America, and Southeast Asia. Countries that receive BRI investments often support China’s positions on global issues, such as the “One China” policy regarding Taiwan and Beijing’s territorial claims in the South China Sea. In return, China offers economic incentives and infrastructure development that further consolidate these alliances [10]. China also utilizes the BRI to advance its strategic objectives in contested regions. The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), a flagship BRI project, has strengthened China’s relationship with Pakistan while increasing its access to the Arabian Sea, reducing its reliance on the Malacca Strait for energy imports [11].

Beyond its economic and political ambitions, the Belt and Road Initiative serves as a key instrument for China's cultural diplomacy. By promoting Chinese culture, language, and values through educational exchanges, media expansion, and Confucius Institutes, China enhances its soft power and fosters deeper international engagement. One of the primary ways China promotes its culture and values through the BRI is by expanding educational exchanges and academic partnerships. The Chinese government has significantly increased the number of scholarships offered to students from BRI countries, enabling them to study at Chinese universities. China has also established partnerships between its universities and academic institutions in BRI partner countries. Joint research programs, student exchange initiatives, and collaborative degree programs have grown in prominence, particularly in Asia and Africa. Beyond formal education, China sponsors cultural and language training programs that introduce foreign students, scholars, and professionals to Chinese traditions, history, and governance philosophy.

Confucius Institutes have been one of the most visible elements of China’s cultural diplomacy under the BRI. These state-funded institutions, modeled after Germany’s Goethe-Institut and France’s Alliance Française, aim to promote Chinese language and culture worldwide. Since the launch of the BRI, the number of Confucius Institutes in participating countries has expanded significantly, with over 500 institutes operating in over 150 countries [12]. Confucius Institutes offer language courses, cultural workshops, and educational materials that promote an understanding of Chinese history and values. They also facilitate people-to-people exchanges, organizing student trips to China, hosting academic conferences, and supporting research on China’s development model. In many developing countries, Confucius Institutes fill an educational gap, providing affordable access to Chinese language training and cultural education.

However, these institutions have also been met with criticism. In some Western countries, concerns have been raised about their influence over academic freedom and their potential role in advancing Chinese political narratives. Some universities in the U.S., Canada, and Europe have closed Confucius Institutes due to fears of undue influence on campus discourse [13]. Despite these challenges, Confucius Institutes remain a core pillar of China’s cultural outreach, particularly in BRI regions where China’s influence faces less resistance.

Chapter Four: Digital Diplomacy and the Belt and Road Initiative

In the modern era of global connectivity, diplomacy has evolved beyond traditional statecraft to incorporate digital tools, giving rise to what is known as digital diplomacy. Digital diplomacy refers to the use of digital technologies—such as social media, e-governance, artificial intelligence (AI), and digital infrastructure—to conduct diplomatic activities, engage international audiences, and influence global narratives¹⁴. Governments and international organizations increasingly leverage these digital platforms to communicate foreign policy objectives, manage global perceptions, and foster cross-border economic and political cooperation. Social media has become a powerful tool in digital diplomacy, enabling states to engage with foreign publics directly. Platforms such as Twitter, Facebook, and WeChat allow governments to disseminate official statements, counter misinformation, and engage in diplomatic discourse without relying on traditional media intermediaries. E-governance and digital infrastructure also play a role in diplomacy by fostering digital trade, improving cross-border connectivity, and facilitating international cooperation on technology standards. By investing in digital infrastructure, countries can extend their influence, establish technological dependencies, and shape global norms regarding digital governance.

China has recognized the strategic importance of digital diplomacy and has actively incorporated it into the Belt and Road Initiative. One of the primary ways China promotes the BRI through digital diplomacy is through social media and online platforms. Chinese state-run media, such as China Global Television Network (CGTN) and Xinhua News Agency. Additionally, Chinese diplomats and government agencies actively engage on platforms like Twitter and WeChat, promoting China's vision for global connectivity and responding to international discourse on the BRI. China also advances its digital diplomacy through digital trade agreements and cross-border e-commerce platforms. Alibaba’s eWTP (Electronic World Trade Platform), for instance, facilitates online trade among BRI countries by lowering barriers for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to access global markets. By integrating e-commerce into the BRI framework, China strengthens economic interdependence and expands the reach of its digital economy.

Chapter Five: Challenges and Criticisms of the BRI as Soft Power

While the Belt and Road Initiative has been a powerful tool for China’s global influence, it has also faced significant criticism from the international community. Skeptics argue that the initiative serves as a geopolitical strategy rather than a purely economic development project. Concerns range from allegations of "debt-trap diplomacy" and lack of transparency to resistance from rival global powers and internal economic constraints within China itself. These challenges have raised questions about the long-term sustainability of the BRI and its effectiveness as a soft power strategy.

One of the most widely debated criticisms of the BRI is that it allegedly creates debt dependency in developing countries. Critics argue that China extends large-scale loans to economically weaker nations, knowing that some will struggle to repay, ultimately allowing China to gain strategic leverage over them. This practice, often referred to as “debt-trap diplomacy,” has been particularly evident in cases where recipient countries have had to surrender key infrastructure assets after failing to meet loan obligations [15]. The most frequently cited example is Sri Lanka’s Hambantota Port. The Sri Lankan government took out significant loans from China to build the port but faced financial difficulties in repaying them. As a result, in 2017, Sri Lanka leased the port to a Chinese state-owned company for 99 years, fueling concerns that China was using financial entanglements to gain geopolitical footholds [7]. Similar concerns have emerged in other countries, such as Djibouti, Pakistan, and Zambia, where Chinese investment has led to rising debt levels and fears of economic dependence on Beijing.

Conclusion

The Belt and Road Initiative has been a defining feature of China’s global engagement strategy, demonstrating the evolving nature of soft power in the 21st century. Unlike traditional soft power efforts that rely solely on cultural diplomacy and ideological appeal, China’s approach integrates economic, digital, and geopolitical dimensions, creating a multi-faceted influence strategy. The BRI has undeniably strengthened China’s global presence, but its long-term success depends on how effectively China addresses criticisms and adapts to the evolving global landscape.

Moving forward, China must focus on improving transparency, ensuring debt sustainability, and fostering more inclusive partnerships if it hopes to solidify the BRI’s reputation as a genuine force for development. As global resistance to Chinese influence grows, Beijing must refine its digital diplomacy strategies to alleviate concerns over surveillance and cybersecurity. If China can navigate these challenges, the BRI will continue to shape global trade, technology, and diplomacy for decades to come. If these issues remain unaddressed, the initiative risks losing credibility and undermining China’s broader soft power ambitions. The BRI represents both an opportunity and a challenge for China and the world. While it has the potential to foster economic growth and global cooperation, its future will ultimately be determined by how well China balances ambition with responsibility, influence with trust, and power with diplomacy.

References:

1. World Bank. Belt and Road Economics: Opportunities and Risks of Transport Corridors. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications, 2019. p. xiii.
2. Fallon, T. The New Silk Road: Xi Jinping's Grand Strategy for Eurasia // American Foreign Policy Interests. 2015. Vol. 37, No. 3. P. 140-147.
3. Shambaugh, D. China's Soft-Power Push // Foreign Affairs. 2015. Vol. 94, No. 4. P. 99-109.
4. Nye, J. S. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: PublicAffairs, 2004. p. X.
5. Gill, B., Huang, Y. Sources and Limits of Chinese "Soft Power" // Survival. 2006. Vol. 48, No. 2. P. 17-36.
6. Huang, Y. Understanding China's Belt & Road Initiative: Motivation, Framework and Assessment // China Economic Review. 2016. Vol. 40. P. 314-321.
7. Hurley, J., Morris, S., Portelance, G. Examining the Debt Implications of the Belt and Road Initiative from a Policy Perspective (No. 121). Washington, DC: Center for Global Development, 2018. p. 20.
8. Hurley, J., Morris, S., Portelance, G. Examining the Debt Implications of the Belt and Road Initiative from a Policy Perspective (No. 121). Washington, DC: Center for Global Development, 2018. p. 10.
9. Zhang, X., Jing, Y. A Mixed Funding Pattern: China's Exercise of Power Within the United Nations // Global Policy. 2024. Vol. 15. P. 121-134. p. 124-125.
10. Doshi, R. The Long Game: China's Grand Strategy to Displace American Order. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021. p. 241.
11. Small, A. The China-Pakistan Axis: Asia's New Geopolitics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. p. 103.
12. Wu, X. 世界各地已有548所孔子学院 // Xinhuanet, 2018. [http://www.xinhuanet.com/world/2018-12/05/c_1210009045.htm]
13. Sahlins, M. Confucius Institutes: Academic Malware. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press, 2015. p. 23.
14. Bjola, C., Holmes, M. Digital Diplomacy: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge, 2015. p. 14.
15. Horn, S., Reinhart, C. M., Trebesch, C. How Much Money Does the World Owe China? // Harvard Business Review, 2020